Fathia Bettahar, Claude Moulin, Jean-Paul Barthes
Look inside Download PDF (free)
Abstract
Research issues have emerged from the rapid introduction of new technologies in government services in order to deliver efficient and cost effective services, information and knowledge through information and communication technologies. However, the complexity of government services and the diversity of actors involved in the processes make the access to the right information difficult and pose several problems. Some problems are linked to the way of presenting and accessing information. Other problems are linked to interoperability among applications and processes of eGovernment services. The objective of the European TerreGov project is to find a solution to such problems. The project focuses on the semantic requirements of governments at local, intermediate and regional levels, needed to build flexible and interoperable tools to support the change towards eGovernment services. We propose, within this project, an ontology to present knowledge and to achieve the required level of semantic interoperability. We use the ontology to describe the domain knowledge of the organization and to index the resources from which civil servants may receive information. The key point of the system is a unique and multimodal ontology used simultaneously for describing domain knowledge, for adding semantics to agency services, for indexing various documents in knowledge bases used by civil servants and finally for supporting the interaction between the users and the system. We present in this paper the challenges of using ontology in eGovernment environments, such as the lack of expressivity of the formalism chosen for interoperability in the project and the risk of inconsistency when the ontology changes. We propose our solution to such challenges and we demonstrate the use of the ontology by the module in charge of managing complex tasks in the system.
Share this item:
Factors Influencing Government Employee Performance via Information Systems Use: an Empirical Study
pp227‑240
Look inside Download PDF (free)
Abstract
Based on the task‑to‑performance chain, this study seeks to investigate the implications and consequences of government employee performance via information systems. Data was collected from 847 employees of the Taipei City government through the stratified proportion sampling method. In addition, the multiple regression method is used to investigate factors that influence employee performance. The results indicate that three factors affect performance: task‑technology fit, computer self‑efficacy, and utilization. Utilization was found to have the greatest positive effect on performance. In addition to verifying prior empirical findings, this study presents factors that influence employee performance and information systems development work in the context of e‑government.
Keywords: task-to-performance chain, task-technology fit, computer self-efficacy, performance, e-government
Share this item:
Abdelbaset Rabaiah, Eddy Vandijck
Look inside Download PDF (free)
Abstract
e‑Government has become a global phenomenon. There have been some great innovations in e‑government over the last decade. Some governments compete for leadership in offering online services. Others do not want to be left behind. Most governments have developed detailed strategies for realizing their e‑government programmes. Although the goals behind these programmes vary across countries, there are still many commonalities among them. Such commonalities result from the application of best practices. Governments have the tendency to learn from each other. We could identify certain trends in e‑government application. e‑Government strategies per se are generally well developed. Yet the problems are mostly associated with implementation. This paper studies the strategies of (21) countries in addition to the European Union to put together a generic strategic framework of e‑government. We found most of these strategies to be lacking a strategic framework ‑ a framework that stems from the e‑government strategy itself. The ultimate purpose of this paper is to introduce a best practice framework that is generic enough to be adopted by any given strategy. The paper argues the missing benefits of such a strategic framework. The proposed framework incorporates very important elements and principles. It has desirable characteristics and features that can add value to the e‑government strategy. Unlike previous studies, the proposed framework defines strategic building blocks of e‑government based on real‑life e‑government implementations of the countries reviewed. Our strategic framework possesses modular design. It is flexible, customisable and extensible. In putting this framework together, we took into consideration commonalities, trends, and best practices in addition to relevant work of other scholars.
Share this item:
Johanna Sefyrin, Christina Mortberg
Look inside Download PDF (free)
Abstract
The Swedish public sector is currently in a process of transformation, often referred to as e‑ Government. In this paper stories are told of problematic silences in an e‑Government implementation project in a Swedish government agency. e‑Government is discussed as something that is articulated differently by a range of actors in various locations. This enables articulations of multiple e‑Government and the multiple articulations can also be a means to contest dominant and possibly problematic articulations of e‑Government. The dominant discourse of e‑Government is the rationalisation of the public sector as a means of saving public resources. The improvement of quality and availability of public services, and to improve democratic processes are central in the dominant discourse. In this discourse there is a silence about the dismissal of employees in the public sector. There is neither talk about how the public sector is an important labour market for women nor how the rationalisation will affect the employees. Employees' knowledges are not considered as being a resource for strategic IT‑planning, and thus they are not invited to participate in the further design of IT‑systems. The purpose of the paper is to explore the participation of the administrative officers in an e‑Government implementation project, and the meanings of e‑Government articulated in the project. Ethnographic methods were used in the collection of empirical material, and central ideas in participatory design and feminist technoscience were used in the analysis. The main argument is that the administrative officers participated in an ambiguous way. They were central actors but were at the same time marginalised within the organisation. The ambiguity regarding how they participated is related to different and more inclusive articulations of e‑ Government in the project. The paper is concluded with a discussion concerning how alternative articulations of e‑Government can offer alternatives to the dominant e‑Government discourse.
Keywords: e-Government, public sector employees, silences, feminist technoscience, participatory design
Share this item:
Hazri Kifle, Patrick Low Kim Cheng
Look inside Download PDF (free)
Abstract
þÿ 000000000000E 000000000000l 000000000000e 000000000000c 000000000000t 000000000000r 000000000000o 000000000000n 000000000000i 000000000000c 000000000000 000000000000( 000000000000e 000000000000) 000000000000 000000000000g 000000000000o 000000000000v 000000000000e 000000000000r 000000000000n 000000000000m 000000000000e 000000000000n 000000000000t 000000000000 000000000000i 000000000000s 000000000000 000000000000n 000000000000o 000000000000w 000000000000 000000000000d 000000000000e 000000000000p 000000000000l 000000000000o 000000000000y 000000000000e 000000000000d 000000000000 000000000000b 000000000000y 000000000000 000000000000m 000000000000a 000000000000n 000000000000y 000000000000 000000000000g 000000000000o 000000000000v 000000000000e 000000000000r 000000000000n 000000000000m 000000000000e 000000000000n 000000000000t 000000000000s 000000000000 000000000000a 000000000000r 000000000000o 000000000000u 000000000000n 000000000000d 000000000000 000000000000t 000000000000h 000000000000e 000000000000 000000000000w 000000000000o 000000000000r 000000000000l 000000000000d 000000000000 000000000000i 000000000000n 000000000000 000000000000o 000000000000r 000000000000d 000000000000e 000000000000r 000000000000 000000000000t 000000000000o 000000000000 000000000000a 000000000000c 000000000000h 000000000000i 000000000000e 000000000000v 000000000000e 000000000000 000000000000t 000000000000h 000000000000e 000000000000 000000000000p 000000000000r 000000000000o 000000000000m 000000000000i 000000000000s 000000000000e 000000000000 000000000000b 000000000000r 000000000000o 000000000000u 000000000000g 000000000000h 000000000000t 000000000000 000000000000b 000000000000y 000000000000 000000000000t 000000000000h 000000000000e 000000000000 000000000000a 000000000000d 000000000000v 000000000000a 000000000000n 000000000000c 000000000000e 000000000000m 000000000000e 000000000000n 000000000000t 000000000000 000000000000o 000000000000f 000000000000 000000000000I 000000000000n 000000000000f 000000000000o 000000000000r 000000000000m 000000000000a 000000000000t 000000000000i 000000000000o 000000000000n 000000000000 000000000000a 000000000000n 000000000000d 000000000000 000000000000C 000000000000o 000000000000m 000000000000m 000000000000u 000000000000n 000000000000i 000000000000c 000000000000a 000000000000t 000000000000i 000000000000o 000000000000n 000000000000 000000000000T 000000000000e 000000000000c 000000000000h 000000000000n 000000000000o 000000000000l 000000000000o 000000000000g 000000000000i 000000000000e 000000000000s 000000000000 000000000000( 000000000000I 000000000000C 000000000000T 000000000000) 000000000000. 000000000000 000000000000T 000000000000h 000000000000e 000000000000 000000000000i 000000000000m 000000000000p 000000000000l 000000000000e 000000000000m 000000000000e 000000000000n 000000000000t 000000000000a 000000000000t 000000000000i 000000000000o 000000000000n 000000000000 000000000000o 000000000000f 000000000000 000000000000m 000000000000a 000000000000n 000000000000y 000000000000 000000000000e 000000000000‑