ISSN 1479-439X

First published
in 2003




 

  Electronic Journal of e-Government
 

Papers in Current Issue

    Home Papers in Current Issue Previous Issues Site Map
     

Home
About the Journal
Scope
Editorial Board
Submission Guidelines
Call for Papers

 

ECEG 2007: The 7th European Conference on e-Government 21-22 June 2007

Click for Information on ECKM 2003 Conference


For information on the European Conference on e-Government, click here

For information on the International Conference on e-Government, click here
 
 
.

Volume 5 Issue 2 Special Issue: ECEG 2007 Den Haag

e-Voting: Same Pilots, Same Problems, Different Agendas
Mark Liptrott
Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK

   

This paper is based on research to establish the reasons that in 2003 some English local authorities volunteered to take part in the e-voting pilot schemes and others did not. Following each e-voting pilot the local authorities are required report to the Electoral Commission. There is no research to establish the reasons that local authorities do not volunteer for the pilots. This paper outlines the preliminary findings from the interviews with Election Officers from pilot and non-pilot authorities to establish the reasons for their decisions. The study is diffusion based research to establish the reasons why an innovation, in this case e-voting, is adopted or rejected. The research is underpinned by Rogers’ diffusion of innovations theory framework to assess whether or not e-voting will diffuse in accordance with that theory.

The findings recognise that the number of authorities willing to join the trials of e-voting are falling and the most influential variables effecting their decision making appear to be the lack of continuity, issues of security, shortage of time for the legislative process, the availability of resources and kudos. The penultimate section of the paper analyses how each of these issues can be addressed by a formal diffusion strategy. The final section includes a recommendation for a revised public policy design as it warns of the potential danger of the lack of feedback from the increasing number of non-pilot authorities. It also suggests that since local authorities appear to have participated in the trials for their own ends there should be a further category included in the sub-dimension of Rogers’ perceived attribute of an innovation, relative advantage. The results demonstrate that consideration of a formal diffusion strategy prior to policy implementation can address the factors inhibiting the adoption of an innovation introduced by central to local government.

Keywords:e-voting, pilot scheme, public policy process, diffusion.

Download FULL PAPER

Back to Contents

Home Papers in Current Issue Previous Issues Site Map

EJEG is published by Academic Conferences Limited
Curtis Farm, Kidmore End, Nr Reading RG4 9AY, England
Tel: +44 (0)1189 724148, Fax: +44 (0)1189 724691, Email: info@ejeg.com

To send questions/comments about this site to the webmaster, jen@itdesigners.com
Copyright © 2002-2004 Electronic Journal of e-Government
Last modified: September 04, 2005